Football Blog: Tangerine Flavoured

Showing posts with label Blackpool comment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Blackpool comment. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 12, 2023

The strange case of Daniel Grimshaw



I have never played football at any notable level, but in the few teams I got picked for I played as a goalkeeper. That means I have particular sympathy for goalkeepers and the way they get the blame but also a particular appreciation for the talent and abilities that goalkeepers have. You can consider me as 'an expert pundit' therefore for the rest of this article, on the basis that I was in a school team about 30 years ago... 

Rewind just over a year and all seemed to be going very well for our Daniel. He hadn't yet had his head kicked off by Cameron Archer and he'd established himself as the firm no1 choice with a series of excellent performances. He's not a dominant keeper, but he showed himself to be an absolute master of anticipation and angles. It's the combination of those two things that, in my humble (expert) opinion puts him ahead of Maxwell. He's capable of reading the game very well and putting himself in exactly the right place to make the stop. He often makes saves less spectacular than they could be, with the ability to make a spectacular one if needs be. That's a quality that reminded me strangely of Neville Southall.

This article is not intended to be a critique of Chris Maxwell. The man has produced several of the best saves I've ever seen and one of the most wondrous goalkeeping displays of our history (Sunderland away in Lg1). It's just intended to explore the oddness at the heart of the ongoing decision to permanently bench one of our brighter young prospects in a season where we've essentially tried everything else twice over and then one more time for good luck. 

Grimmy had a really good 21/22 season. The numbers back up the impression his performances gave. If we look at Footmob's 'Goals Prevented' stat (basically speaking, the number of goals a keeper would be expected to concede from the shots they face) Grimshaw comes out as the 4th best keeper in the division with a score of +4.3. For reference, Maxwell this season is 17th in the division with a score of -4.1 - Yes, Maxwell has been in front of a weaker defence, but the metric simply considers whether or not any given shot could be expected to be saved - and the more shots you face, the more saves you can make. By this simple measure 21/22 Grimmy is worth 8 goals more than 22/23 Maxwell. 

That was last year vs this year though. It's not a fair comparison. Grimmy was playing behind a much more cohesive unit and thus his decision making was much easier. Maxwell has played behind an ever changing and ever more calamity prone unit and we have to understand how that can eat away at the keeper's ability to make the right choice in any given situation. His own stats for the previous season were a far more respectable +1.4 which suggests he also benefited from a more stable defence in front of him. 

Lets look at this season instead in a bit more depth than Footmob can provide. 

This season, Grimshaw struggled a bit with the more possession based style of play that Appleton attempted to enforce. He'd thrived in Critchley's more direct style - to the point where Grimshaw to Madine was the single most frequent successful pass by any keeper in the league (whoscored) - but playing triangles with the equally struggling Ekpiteta and hapless Williams exposed one of his weaker abilities. 

When Maxwell came into the side, I could see the logic. Grimshaw isn't a communicator - or, at least, he isn't a voluble organiser like Maxwell is. Without any particularly experienced defenders, it made a certain amount of sense to try the goalkeeper in an attempt to bring some leadership to the backline. 

What I find really strange however, is, how we've continued with this all season, despite it palpably not working. The stats below (fbref) show a story. Grimshaw's (even this season, where he was not, in the limited number of games he played, close to his best) numbers suggest he has been worth another opportunity

Grimshaw has conceded goals at a lower rate than Maxwell (1.46 per game compared to 1.71) 
Grimshaw has made more saves per 90 minutes than Maxwell (3.62 vs 3.07) 
Grimshaw has a higher clean sheet rate than Maxwell (23.1% vs 17.1%) 
Grimshaw's 'post shot XG 'is a lot higher than Maxwell's (+1.2 vs -3.0) 
Grimshaw's 'post shot' XG vs GA per 90 (no, me neither) is higher than Maxwell's (+0.09 vs -0.11)
Grimshaw's completion rate of long passes is higher than Maxwell's (39.5% vs 35%) 
Maxwell has the edge on stopping crosses (5.4% vs 1.2%) 
Grimshaw's overall pass completion rate is higher than Maxwell's (61.3 vs 52.9) (whoscored) 

Analysing the data reveals another interesting element between the two. Grimshaw plays much deeper in general than Maxwell. That's a surprising fact given his history as a Manchester City keeper, presumably groomed in the art of 'joining in' with outfield play. Both of them have played deeper this season than they did last year - Grimshaw in particular has retreated about 4 metres - IS that tactical? Is it a product of defensive changes or uncertainty? Is it a product of the team being under more pressure or setting up deeper in defence? It's difficult to know. 

The only notable area I can find where Grimshaw is palpably weaker is 'stopping crosses' - which is possibly a product of Grimshaw making an active decision to react as opposed to intercept - there is an argument that a keeper who always stays is easier for a defence to work around than a keeper who is indecisive. Maxwell's relative strength in this area isn't absolute either - the previous season, Grimshaw was marginally (3.8%) better than Maxwell (3.2%) at stopping crosses - but both of them are very low in the overall standings for that particular metric in both years. 

I want to reiterate that I'm not writing this article to make any particular point about Chris Maxwell. What I'm writing it for, is to question the oddness of the fact we've willingly left out a goalkeeper who, whilst not good on crosses, is demonstrably good at other things. Here's a few more interesting stats to back up the idea that Grimshaw has evident strengths that have been overlooked. 

In 21/22 Grimshaw was the 1/65 keeper in the entire championship for accurate long kicks. It seems, therefore, particularly bizarre to have left him out in the latter part of the season where we've played directly. This season he has been 7/50. (fbref)

In 21/22 Grimshaw was 7/65 at shot stopping in the championship per 90. This season he was 13/50 (fbref)

Both seasons he has played for us, his passing average overall has been superior to the other keepers on our books. (whoscored) 

Both seasons his goals per game conceded has also been lower. (fbref) 

In short - I'm mystified by the ongoing decision to leave him out. He may not be the greatest on crosses, but every other available metric suggests he's at very least, worth another chance. It has been mooted that he's been involved in some kind of bust up or falling out - which is of course, possible, but it seems genuinely strange that if that were the case, that he's travelled across the country with the squad as back up all season, instead of being shipped out on loan to allow another goalkeeper to come in?

I have no idea what the situation is - but what I see, is a talented goalkeeper - not perfect (but what keeper is? A big lad who takes all the crosses often lacks agility or mobility) who is being left to gather dust at a point where he could and should be learning important lessons and improving. As the stats above show, whilst Grimshaw didn't have as good a start to the season as he might have done, he's still at very least, performed no worse than the player who replaced him (and arguably, better) and it therefore seems bizarre that the lad has been pushed to the fringes, when squad selection has at times seemed to be done via a bingo machine.

It makes no sense to me at all in any respect - Grimshaw on 21/22 performance was becoming a valuable asset. We gave him a new contract to acknowledge that. He was a valuable contributor to the team. A few questionable games (mainly Rotherham away) shouldn't render him completely valueless and indeed, the majority of the data paints his performances this season as far from calamitous.

I wouldn't seek to blame Chris Maxwell for everything that's gone wrong this year - I'm just perplexed as to why the football club appears to have made Grimshaw the individual scapegoat for a season of disaster.  If the reason is simply that he's poor on crosses (which is the only reason the numbers suggest) and our team is collectively tiny, then playing a keeper who is not that much better either (and actually a little bit smaller) is hardly addressing the concern. 

#freegrimmy 

Onward  


You can follow MCLF on facebook or Twitter or use Follow.it to get posts sent to your email If you appreciate the blog and judge it worth 1p or more, then a donation to one of the causes below which help kids and families in Blackpool would be grand. 

Sunday, February 12, 2023

Rock bottom and how we got there: 12 months of transfers reviewed

January 2022 and we're doing pretty well. I don't feel as if we're going to get relegated and I'm looking forward to seeing our new signing Cameron Brannagan replacing Ryan Wintle as the lynchpin in midfield and getting some of our injured players back. We've got a pragmatic and popular coach who has done well and the club is moving forward overall.  

Anyone remember laughing at that Oxford fan on twitter posting about ponds? Bastard was right. 

February 2023 and we've had 2 managerial changes, we're bottom of the league. We never did see Brannagan or frankly, replace Ryan Wintle with anyone half convincing. The man who managed us the year before walked out on us in a weird midnight flit. We're managed by a man I don't think anyone could possibly have predicted would ever be our manager who replaced another man whose appointment appeared to be an internet prank until you checked the dates carefully and realised that it was real. 

I'm not intending to discuss either of those managers in any depth. I don't think anyone can be sure how Mick will actually do. You can guess, but you don't know. I retain a degree of sympathy for Michael Appleton but equally, it's impossible to make the case that he 'did well' in any meaningful way. 

For my main course, I will cook a big mess out of random stuff in the fridge that doesn't really go together and lacks body and bite. Yum yum. 

What I want to do is look at the structures behind them. The strategy that drives the club forward (it seems apt to note that we've also got a reverse gear given on pitch happenings at the moment) 

Lets go back to January 2022. The body warmer is on and Mike Garrity is bellowing. We're playing well. Fans are giddy types and we're hoping for a play off push by the end of the window. That's fanciful nonsense but there's a sense that we've got something we can build upon and no reason why we can't at some style to the functional championship we've shown ourselves to be. 

We sign the following: 

Owen Dale: (loan move made permanent) He initially looked like the greatest player in the world. He then didn't look like very good at all apart from playing well at Barnsley. He is now on loan in League 1. It didn't work out. He doesn't play very much for us, then goes and is quite good elsewhere.  

Jake Beesley (permanent): The big lad from Rochdale seems a lovely sort, but he's scored twice against Birmingham and done very little else other than be injured. He's too old to be a 'hot prospect' and now he's got a perfect shot at playing in a team that needs a big lad, he's once again on the treatment table.  It hasn't, thus far worked out. He hasn't played very much.

Charlie Kirk: (loan) He does ok-ish sometimes and he plays semi-regularly but doesn't really excite anyone too much. It doesn't work out and he ends up at Charlton in the end. 

We clearly decided to stick instead of twist in that January window. That's ok. We weren't going up in a month of Sundays and January is really bad in terms of value. Trust the process etc. 


Roll on summer 22 I'm on holiday as Critchley does his silent mime vanishing act. Ben Mansford is hurriedly shoved on to Tangerine TV to insist everything is ok and that we've got schroedinger's transfer budget - we both have no money but it's ok because we have plenty of money if we need it. I'm in a Northumbria pub as my better half shakes her head and says 'does the football take over everything? We're on bloody holiday...' and I say something along the lines of 'yeah, sorry, he does look flustered though... who do you think we'll get in?' (She doesn't care.)  

The board announce Michael Appleton. It's a bold move... 

We're definitely going to sign some quality. There's a lad at Sheffield Wednesday, a lad at Rotherham. A striker from Pompey and of course, Cameron Brannagan. 

We all know what happens next. It turns out a pond wins against the 1953 FA Cup winners. We don't bring in anyone that we expected to. 

If we get Gaz to do summat daft Simon, everyone will overlook the other stuff. 
Ben, I'm not sure that's how it works. 
Trust me Simon. I'm a professional... 

Instead, we sign: 

Dom Thompson (permanent) - who tries hard and is very likeable but makes a hat full of mistakes (it's quite a big hat too). It turns out Jimmy 'League One clogger' Husband is actually not bad after all. Who knew? (Me. I did. I fucking told you all) 

Callum Wright (permanent)- This one is really weird. He's seemingly another attacking midfielder in a squad is now overflowing with attacking midfielders. He plays ok once and then looks terrified of football, football kits, football boots, footballs and footballers and is sold to Plymouth where he immediately scores some goals and presumably faces up to his fears. 

Callum Wright on the bench. Actual footage from his time with us.  

Charlie Patino (loan) -
He comes with a YouTube compilation and a great fanfare so he must be good. Right? He's even *actually played* in an *actual Arsenal game*. Is he a success? He scores against Preston and has a banging chant. He tries very, very hard. He has some poor games. He does ok. 

Lewis Fiorini (loan) - He looks a bit like he should be in the film of 'A Clockwork Orange' - he plays really well for 45 minutes against a QPR team in form in a really good display and then gets injured, never to be seen again. Presumably running with the droogs at the Korova Milk Bar

Lads, it's fine, I've told them I've done my hamstring. Now lets get wrecked and go on a marauding spree. 

Theo Corbeaneu (loan)-
One of the weirdest players I've ever seen. He runs at oblique shifting angles. He scores some goals. He gets dressed down on the pitch by his teammates quite regularly because he doesn't seem to understand the difference between 'a kickabout where you can take the piss running about in circles' and 'actual football where it matters what you do.' He gets sent back to Wolves. 

I know it's wrong, but I sort of miss Theo. 

Rhys Williams (loan)-
He's big and gangling. He looks at first like a kid who plays a different sport being asked to join in because the football team is short of numbers. He gets a bit better as time goes on. He goes back in January apparently to bolster their numbers, a fact which makes me laugh out loud when my Liverpool mate tells me this. 

Ian Poveda (loan)- He's not actually called Ian because he's a mad Columbian combination of the musician Prince and a pimp who also happens to have the skills of Maradona and the timekeeping and general work ethic of a stoner at Woodstock festival. He's both brilliant and seemingly unpickable. The latter point somewhat defeats the point of the loan. We love him, but we're denied him. He's like some long distance affair, brief passionate liaisons that feel like an illicit thrill, before he vanishes into the night evading the authorities always on his tail... Poveda! 

I actually made this. What is my life? I'm fucking 43 years old. Have word with yourself for encouraging this sort of thing. 

Summer turns to autumn and we play quite well in some games, even brilliantly in short flashes but terribly for long spells in others. We supplement the squad with free agent signings: 

Grant Ward (free agent) - This is a climb down for everyone. Michael Appleton has publicly stated he doesn't want Grant Ward to play in his midfield. He likely wants Grant Ward to play right back even less. Guess what happens? Ward is a player we owe a debt to so it's sad that his final games are two horrible right back displays where it looks like a) he isn't a right back and b) he hasn't played football for 14 months. The fact both of which things are true, doesn't stop people declaring him 'shite' which he isn't and is unfair. 

Liam Bridcutt (free agent) This one is a punt. It's like buying a fancy car in the paper that's much cheaper than it should be. You know the head gasket is probably blown or it's a cut and shut, but you just can't resist. Bridcutt might as well be at one of those market stalls where they sell broken biscuits and stuff that's past its sell by date. We sign him anyway. He has a couple of good games and then gets injured. He reminds us of Kevin Stewart in a good way. He also reminds us of Kevin Stewart in a bad way. 


October comes and goes and our form goes from inconsistent to what can very fairly described as awful. January 23 cannot come quick enough and replacements are needed. 

The first half of the window is all about serving Appleton's (now somewhat unpopular to say the least) idea of a fluent 433 and so, we sign... 

Josh Bowler (loan) - this one took a lot of scouting and effort. Seen as he'd played for us until September and could legally only play for us, you have to hand it to the scouting team for scouring the globe and coming up with this one. He weirdly has a spell as a central midfielder for no reason anyone on earth can fathom, before scoring on his home return from right wing. 

Morgan Rogers  (loan)- Like Bridcutt, this has 'Mike getting the gang back together' all over it. He looks pretty good. Like a souped up CJ Hamilton with sponges on his feet to cushion that classic CJ first touch. He doesn't start though, which leaves a distinct impression that he's not yet fit. 

Tommy Trybull (permanent) - Who? Oh, ok, he played for Norwich and Blackburn. I'll pretend I knew that. His YouTube compilation is pleasingly brutal, full of him clattering in with well timed and full blooded challenges. He looks just the man to replace Kevin and Liam in being our midfield enforcer. He shows up, looks quite crisp and neat, makes a few tackles and then limps off. For the love of god.

Simon, the game didn't say anything about 'injuredness' How were we to know? 

Charlie Goode (loan) -
I swear he's a cash in hand hod carrier my auntie once went out with that my mum used to tut about. Mind you, if he is, that would make him about 60 so it's probably not the case. He's big, he's bearded, he looks like he's been bought solely so that Mick has someone who can knock Gaz out if required. Guess what happens next? Yep. He gets injured. 

Curtis Nelson (permanent)- Mick's mate from Cardiff. He looks a bit rough in one game, kind of ok in the other and you'll never ever guess what happens next. Yes, he misses his third start with an injury. It turns out you guessed right. 

Andy Lyons (permanent) - I saved him till last as he's actually proved (so far) to be really good. He looks feisty and clever, scores a lovely goal and we finally have two actual right backs at the club (Simon Sadler telling us we did anyway, didn't make it true) and both of them are decent. 

Now it's now and the window is shut and we've got the squad we've got. I promised not to analyse managers but it's inevitable that a bit of discussion of their styles and how the players fit that is needed. 

Michael Appleton wanted to play a more possession based style than Neil Critchley, whose success was built on a solid back 6 and quick breaks. Losing Fiorini was a blow, but the fact we never snared a dominant midfielder to shield the defence and let the likes of Patino and Carey have a more free role was an absolute disaster. Bridcutt briefly looked like he could be that man, but the odds of him staying fit were such that it was like assuming you'd won the lottery when you saw you'd got the first number right. The loans were, for varying reasons, mostly a disaster. We ended up with a disjointed, leaderless squad and crucially, lacked width up front which meant we had to rely on Gary 'battered snowplough stuck in first gear' Madine up front on his own with Yates and Lavery masquerading as wide men. 

January came and Trybull, Bowler and Rogers seemed to address those key weaknesses. The board seemed to have dug in and finally backed the manager except it turned out that they hadn't. Mike went and Mick arrived. The squad now looked just about ready to do what Appleton wanted it to do - with Poveda on fire and enough technical ability to imagine Yates dancing about onto through balls and playing one twos. Next second he was gone. I'm not trying to argue he should have stayed, I'm just setting the scene for what comes next and the sheer table cloth pulling surprise of it all.  

Big Mick likes big lads. He takes one look at Ian chipping the keeper at Southampton, Josh not touching the ball at Boro and Patino doing those little shimmies where he looks really good, but could have just passed it first time and thinks 'where the hell am I?' and reaches for his contacts book. 'Get me anyone over 6ft 2 - TC, make us a brew and tell us a joke, bloody hell, it's like bloody land of the midgets here, what's them lads in that Chocolate factory book? Oompa Oompas? Is that what they'called. Never mind. I tell what, them novelists, they think of all sorts don't they. Them anyway. I've got a bloody squad of them. Tell you what TC, we should have had a look first before leaping into this. Bring us a digestive will you?' 

We can clearly see that providing the two managers we've had with the right players has been a challenge. My theory (based on nothing in particular) would be that Critchley actually knitted a lot of the vaunted 'backroom process' together. He was nothing if not diligent. I have it on good authority* that he watched games almost constantly when not 'on the grass' or admiring his fabreze scented polo shirt collection in his neatly arranged wardrobes in his neatly arranged house with his neatly tidy car neatly parked on his drive surrounded by the neat lawn on a neat cul-de-sac in the neat little estate where he and Jannine live. 

*i.e. someone said it to me once. 

When we look at the 18 players we've signed, we can analyse it in a number of ways: 

5 players (Kirk, Dale, Bridcutt, Rogers and Nelson) were likely a product of the manager knowing them from previous jobs. 
2 players (Ward and Bowler) were known to the club already. 

That means 11 of them are the product of some kind of scouting process. 

2 of them come from somewhere outside of the English league (Lyons and Trybull) 
The remaining players come from either the reserves or u23s of a Premier League side aside from Beesley who came from Rochdale. 

It's hard to look at the names above and see anyone who has really impacted our season in the way we hoped new players would. Lyons looks like he could be a success. Patino has shouldered a heavy load and done it with admirable effort, but he's not really been the difference maker we dreamt of. Bowler is Bowler and we had him already. Rogers looks handy. Nelson, it's impossible to judge. Trybull, we can only hope isn't Bridcutt mark 2. 

The key problem for me this season hasn't actually been our manager or players. It's that we're now (if we count Critchley) 3 managers on from last January and our key players are still the same ones as they were in August 22 (or even in the League 1 promotion season) - We're still reliant on Husband, Dougall, Thorniley, Yates, Madine, Ekpiteta, Maxwell, aided by Bowler, Connolly, Lavery, Carey and so on. Again, I'm not arguing any manager this year has been a football genius - I'm just suggesting that they've not really been helped by the circumstances. 

These players above have a lot going for them, but they're now playing their third different style of football in less than 10 months. Some of these players we felt might struggle with the step up from the league below when it came and yet, here they still are and how much they've run and fought in that time since. They've really not been well served by the choice of many of their new teammates or the 90 degree switches in footballing philosophy

It's madness to suggest we should be paying out the same fees and wages as the clubs in this league who are at the top, but I don't think it's madness to suggest we really could and should have made the money we have work a bit harder. What I find curious is that we've seemingly completely abandoned scouring the lower leagues for talent. Only Beesley came to us via this route whereas Ekpiteta, Anderson, Yates (sort of) and Carey all came from lowly clubs or reputations built in the lower leagues. Where are the 25 year olds hungry to prove they're good enough? We also seemed to completely miss the boat with signing anyone released over summer - the year before, we picked up a slew of talent this way (Grimshaw, Connoly, Bowler for example) and whilst Wright and Thompson did come from the Premier League, both were still in contract with their parent clubs. No one came in with the sting of rejection motivating them to show the error of the decision to release them... 

It was almost as if Critchley legged it with the plan in his back pocket. I might post the picture of Ben with 'turmoil' written on him again... 

The players we've signed who haven't worked aren't necessarily bad players. Some of them are probably very good players, but we've never looked like we're making a jigsaw, more that we're laying crazy paving out of bits of stuff we can find. We've had some dreadful luck with injuries with both extant and new squad members, but there has come points when the strategy of 'kids + older players who are cheap and we must cross our fingers and toes that their bodies will hold up' has left the kids high and dry which in turn, means those kids lose confidence and things get worse still. In a similar vein, we rightly bemoaned the loss of Keogh, but the attempt to play football with no defensive midfield I would argue left our defenders with a kind of football shell shock, so unused were they to being the first and last line of defence and that declining confidence manifested itself in panic, red cards and gaffes. In turn, the players we'd perhaps hoped to flip for money to fund new players have declined in value as simply put, people don't want to shell out multi-millions for players who were good six or twelve months ago but aren't any more... 

Oh, so grim. 

The good news is this. The only way is up. (technically, it's not but just run with it for the sake of hope for fucks sake!) - McCarthy might not be your cup of Yorkshire tea, but he will give clear messages. We might not look very good right now, but the effort is there and the players are gamely trying to carry out what he's asking them to do. A plan is always better than no plan and a plan that people buy into is more important than a plan that looks good, but people can't follow. Mick's plan isn't subtle and perhaps that's what a team low on confidence needs. We can only hope.

It's the hope that kills you. 

We've also revamped the recruitment team. It's quite difficult to work out if they've had much impact or not as yet, but Coventry (where they came from) have been a side who play lovely football on a small budget for quite some time and have had some remarkably good players in recent years. If Mick is all about staying up, I suspect the signings we've made are all about the immediate context and not future planning. The duel swoop for a known quality in this area would suggest the club are well aware of what I'll kindly describe as the 'deficits in our recruitment over a period of time.' Others may use their own descriptions.  

It's to be hoped that summer (when we've secured our status in the league obviously) is about giving us a coherent identity and that there's a list of literally hundreds of targets being monitored right now. The squad has been desperate for evolution and summer, (regardless of the division we're in) will bring a revolution akin to that of Sadler's first season and that needs more than Mansford's mates and some lads the manager knows to be successful. We've blown the opportunity to evolve and therefore this is where we are. 

We're not going down though. Cos we're better than that. 

Onwards. 

 

 You can follow MCLF on facebook or Twitter or use Follow.it to get posts sent to your email If you appreciate the blog and judge it worth 1p or more, then a donation to one of the causes below which help kids and families in Blackpool would be grand. 

Wednesday, July 20, 2022

Season Preview 22/23



An introduction


In the last few years, the club has been kind enough to get the transfer business out of the way nice and early. That's been very helpful to me as a blogger as it's given me loads to chat shit about about in preseason. This year, things have been different which has left me hovering over a keyboard, trying to work out how not to say the same things about the same players... 

Various theories have been posited as to why this is - a selection are offered below: 

- We're skint cos... Ben Mansford spent the transfer kitty on expensive looking open necked shirts with very posh looking collars. 
- We're skint cos... Ben Mansford spent the transfer kitty on attachment therapy after some twat in a body warmer who he thought was his BFF walked out on him for a scouse gangster who is best known for falling over at an inopportune moment. 
- We're skint cos... Ben Mansford has had a bit much Chablis when doing big Gaz's new contract and added a couple of zeros by accident. 
- We're skint cos... we've paid so many people to look for and evaluate transfer targets that we've not got any money to actually buy any of them. 
- We're not skint... and we're just taking time to adjust to the new priorities that a new manager and a new style of football brings... 

'An enthralling read. 5 stars'

So far, the signs are that Micky Apples a) won't wear a sleeveless padded jacked and club polo shirt ensemble on the touchline and b) will want to play football. 

Preseason isn't always a great guide to what will happen but we've set up to pass and several times thrown quite a few attacking players on the pitch at once. He's signed a midfielder who, on first viewing, likes to knock it about and attack the goal (Fiorini) and a supposedly footballing centre-half (Williams.) He's also given game time to Yates and Carey in key positions. These are two of the best 'footballers' in the current squad, which suggests he wants players with technique in crucial roles. 

The squad (as it stands): 

I'm looking forward to seeing how this all works. With Anderson, Fiorini, Carey and Bowler (provided he stays, which, if it was up to me, he would) there should be plenty of firepower/creativity coming from deeper or to some extent wide. Connolly adds steel but also isn't averse to a late run into the box or a shot and if Matty Virtue can stay fit, he could be an excellent balance between attacking and defensive midfield. This should also allow Dougall to do what he does best without the pressure of having to also run a game of football. We might even see Kev Stewart once in a while... 

I'm loathe to write off a player, but I'm struggling a bit to see where CJ fits into this system. He's very good at haring away from players, but less good when he's found the space. His technique isn't such that it's easy to visualise him fitting into a one touch pass and move system. I think CJ could probably win an Olympic speed skating medal but he just doesn't use the ball quick enough for the system I can see us playing. I could be wrong - I never thought Madine would fit into Critchball, I though KDH was shit at first. I though Simon Wiles would be the second coming of Stanley Matthews and so on... I hope he shoves this shite down my stupid gobby blogging throat. 

I've liked what I've seen of Rob Apter - his directness and ability to deliver a fizzing ball shouldn't be undervalued in a squad who last year couldn't cross to save its collective life. He's clearly got stuff to add to his game and I'm not quite on the 'play him at full back' hype train but like Carey last season, my impression of him in preseason is that he doesn't look at all apprehensive about playing with the big boys and that they seem perfectly happy to give him the ball. Sometimes you see youth players being nursed through the game but that's not been the case. I'm not sure he's ready to be thrown in at the deep end immediately but I think he's a player to definitely keep about the squad. Sooner or later one of the young lads has to be given a chance and Apter needs either a really challenging loan where he'll get lots of minutes at a good level or some minutes here and there with us in the league and to play in the cups. 

The Italian has a vibe of casual violence about him. In a good way. He's all flick knives and technique. I could see him in a Clockwork Orange or Trainspotting.  He should add a lot to our set up. He adds something similar to Sonny Carey but if we are going to play football, we need more than just him. He's looked excellent in the flashes we've seen of him, and he seems to have been eating some nourishing food since he's been injured as he's also put himself about more, winning the ball, clattering into people. That's really promising as, whilst I've no doubt he's got ability and a lovely football brain, the few times he didn't impress last year, he looked a bit waif like and blown away by the physicality of high level football - hopefully, that will be less of an issue this season. 

Fiorini has a certain style... 

Up front is a bit harder to work out (though it has just come to mind, that I still have no idea what Owen Dale is for - to the extent that I thought about players like Apter before I thought about him... anyway... the front three...) Bowler (see above caveat) will likely do a decent job in front three but then who plays with him, I don't know. On paper, Lavery has the best blend of physique and pace but his touch and link play can be a bit lacking and he really does need to stop falling over so much. Yates has all the link play, but he sometimes struggles to impose himself. Gaz has link play of an angel (no, really) but doesn't really seem born to play the role of lone striker, in the same way a big shirehorse is a wonderful thing if you want to pull a truck full of beer, but perhaps less so if you want to win the Grand National*. Beesley is injured and a bit unknown still - I liked what I saw, but I also don't really feel that a side built around Beesley feels realistic. Lubala deserves credit for his attitude and he's got a blend of pace and muscle that gives him a little bit of difference to the other lads, but it has to also be said, he wasn't very good in the division below. 

*What I'm saying here, may appear, (to the reader who is not attuned to nuance), as if I am calling wor Gaz 'a carthorse' - I suppose, I am in a sense, but with the logic that a thoroughbred shire horse is a magnificent beast. Dressage ponies are all fine and dandy, but frankly, a shire horse would deck any other horse, Red Rum included. #allhailthegoalmachine.

(I'm hoping very much that next season isn't like 'Animal Farm' and wor Gaz isn't playing the role of Boxer - the last two seasons show us that best laid plans can go in the bin and plan B can become plan A and honestly, dropping the whole 'hilarious' Gaz-worship thing for a second, Gaz has never looked fitter and as an option we've already got contracted to change things up, we shouldn't look a gift horse in the mouth)

He's a goal machine... 

It's the left side of attack/wings that baffles me a bit. I've already said what I've said about CJ and Appleton has shown no sign of playing Keshi there. Who else is there? I really don't know. It feels like a bit of a gap we need to fill to me. I think we'll probably have evolved from hopeful long diagonals to the corner, which is the tactic upon which CJ really excelled early on in his Pool career. 

Defensively, we're looking much the same as we did last year and again, we seem to have less fullbacks than is wise. I'm not wholly convinced by Garbutt. I am convinced by Husband. Many would have it the other way round, but I think Garbutt is quite a reactive (and injury prone) player who looks stylish but has problems with positioning. Husband is more rugged but his crossing is weaker, though I think his short game and ability to set a tempo on the left is vastly under-rated as his general attitude. He's a perfectly respectable fullback in my view. Any decent side ever has skilful players of course, but they also invariably feature a sprinkling of players whose attitude is their main asset - I think Jimmy is one of ours. If Phil Neville can win a European cup then so can Jimmy... 

On the right Jordan Gabriel is a legend. He might sometimes try and play every position, but his energy is such that more often than not, he'll be an extra man in a situation rather than missing in his own position. Jack Moore, like Rob Apter is obviously quite good at football. Whether he's good enough to be a championship player, I don't know. We do still really need a right back and also, Burnley can fuck right off hovering about Gabriel like some rich bastard going to a food bank cos they've heard there's caviar in stock this week. 

In the middle, Marvin remains and that gives us a lot to work around. Trickie Dickie is a year older and injuries were starting to bite last season. I don't think it's physically possible for him to lose pace, so we just better hope his eyesight holds and his creaking legs make it through one more year, cos he's class. Personally, I think Thorniley is decent enough and can clearly play football as well as defend. The lad from Liverpool hasn't come with glowing recommendations from my Liverpool mate, but then he also doesn't accept that Brett Ormerod in his prime was probably the greatest player in football history and definitely better than Salah, so what does he know about football at all? I've nowt to say about him till I see him play. 

If Keogh scores... we're on the pitch...

I really like Douglas Tharme - He's decisive, big, has that Madine-like quality of being better with the ball than stereotypes would suggest he will be and his name is wonderfully 1930s. 'Douglas Tharme' sounds like someone who might have been an adventurer back in the days before drones and Google Earth meant you didn't need to actually go anywhere anymore. I like to imagine black and white footage of him emerging from a jungle in Borneo or setting off to the arctic aboard a whaling ship. I hope he gets some decent football this season and we find out if he's really good or really a budget Ben Heneghan. 

In terms of keepers, though it seems some have decided Maxwell is worse than the lovechild of Kingson, Capleton and Sealey, he's not suddenly become a bad keeper. He is, however, firmly back up to Grimshaw, who is without doubt, the number 1 for the season, barring anyone trying to kick his head off again. 

A prediction-y bit. 

I don't know what the season holds for us. I don't think we're going to go down. Whilst we don't have quite the same fair wind in terms of crisis clubs around the division and promotion excitement driving us on, there's a few teams looking shaky and we also still have time to go into the season looking stronger than we did last year. I wasn't hugely impressed with many sides and whilst that might be dangerous, I think we can mix it again. 

I'm really hoping a couple of players can join the likes of Marvin in stepping up and properly establishing themselves. Carey is the obvious one, though I think we need to be patient to an extent and realise how inexperienced he is. Connolly could be a really important player, especially if Appleton commits to playing him in one position. I really would like Matty Virtue to have an injury free season and then we can at least know if he's got it or not. Sometimes I think he's a yard off the pace, other times I adore his style and endeavour - every time he's had a run, something happens, be it Covid, or repeated injury. This season could be big for him. 

I also think, if we are going to play fluid, attacking football, we could see a reborn Jerry Yates. The lad can really play and the fact he gets assists as well as goals shows that he's all about vision. That little pass for Lubala vs Rangers is just the latest in a line of frankly outrageous stuff he's done in Pool shirt. Of everyone, Jerry really didn't suit the direct style our former manager employed and he's a player who could yet prove himself because you don't score the kind of goals he scored in League 1 (or finish as our most productive forward last year) if you are shite. 

I'm going to say we can improve on last year - I think we'll finish somewhere around the middle, maybe 14th if you're going to pin my down and do that typewriter thing on my chest till I blurt out a league position - but we'll play with more style. I'm being horribly optimistic perhaps, I'm assuming that we'll sign a few more (primarily a left sided winger/attacker and a right back) and they'll be decent, I'm assuming that the players are warming to Appleton in the way I have so far and I'm assuming that we can make sense of a forward line that doesn't wholly make sense. I can also see a season of struggle. This is the infinite joy of football - that it beguiles and makes fools of us all. It would be crap to support PSG. It genuinely would. 

'Mystic Mitch' 

To be honest, I don't really like predicting stuff. In fact, I'm so shite at it that basically, you can put a cast iron bet* on that CJ will be top scorer and end the season valued at about £30 million. Whatever happens, it will be football and one of the teams will be in tangerine and there will be noise. 

*not now I've written it down though. 

Onwards! 



 

You can follow MCLF on facebook or Twitter or use Follow.it to get posts sent to your email 
 If you appreciate the blog and judge it worth 1p or more, then a donation to one of the causes below which help kids and families in Blackpool would be grand. Home-Start Blackpool Food Bank

I'm also flogging a book, which is a bit like this blog but longer and more papery - It's available here. The profits will go to Blackpool Food Bank. 

Praise for 'Was that a dream? - Blackpool FC 20/21' 

"A bit better than I expected" (SAFCblog) 
"A few typos" (Amazon) 

Wednesday, December 22, 2021

Halfway point (squad review, numbers, too many words)


Welcome to the MCLF halfway report. It's like something you'd read in the actual paper but not as good because it's not got someone going 'oi, that's way too long and you've missed out the apostrophe there!'

That's how you market a blog. I haven't got to the lofty heights of 'third best Blackpool blog on the internet' (if you discount a few) without knowing a trick or two about how to market what people call 'content' - If you like quantity, stick around.

Quality might be lacking though...  

Goalkeepers: 

We've got good ones. No one knows why Stuart Moore is kept hanging around but he did well in the few minutes he's played against Blackburn Rovers. It's a bit weird how he seems only there to sit on the bench though, like he's some kind of novelty mascot. I imagine Critch makes him drive around with him when he pops to Aldi and such, but makes him stay in the car just because he likes to have him sat there. Maybe he's very fragrant? 

Chris Maxwell is a quality keeper and anyone who says otherwise can get in the sea. Recency bias says we mostly remember him limping about not being at his best but if you want to recall how good he is think of Sunderland away and recall how he seemed to be trying to outdo himself save by save. Think of the clean sheets last year. Think back through all our keepers of the last god knows how many years and find one who is obviously better. 

I like Dan Grimshaw. He looks as if he's a hung-over lumberjack and he makes goalkeeping look quite simple, a matter of being in the right place at the right time. At first I thought he was one of those keepers who claps and points put then dives over the ball but it turns out he's pretty good at both saving the ball and lofting it to Jordan Gabriel. He's very calm and he's improving. Lovely stuff! 

---

Right backs: 

Who remembers when we didn't have any? Callum Connolly (who has never actually played where I think he'd play best) looks like he's from the 1950s and he plays like it too. Very reliable and reserved but not very outgoing. That sort of works as an analogy. He didn't really work at right back for me as we always looked a bit wonky with him not being very adept at carrying the ball though he certainly put a shift in defensively. He's a bit like that when he plays in midfield too. Remember when Ian Rush left Liverpool, so they went and bought John Aldridge because he looked a bit like him and played a bit like him? That's Ollie Turton and Callum Connelly in my head. 

Look - they're a bit the same. 

Dujon Sterling
had us salivating after his first couple of games at full back. He looked ready to step into the Chelsea team and we were all thanking Mr Abramovich for lending us one of his massive stockpile of players that we might have been able to have anyway hadn't if he hadn't have created a kind of Romanian orphanage for young footballers that was then copied by all the other Premier League clubs. As it turns out, our initial perceptions were a bit wonky - Dujon is fine, but he's not as good as the next lad on the list. 

Jordan Gabriel has the worst chant ever, but he's mint. The only thing he can't do is shoot. He's really bad at that. That doesn't matter. He's a right back. We've got him for ages as well. He's practically the new Mike Davies. He'll need to work on dinking it though. Love him to bits. I'd say he's even better than Fonz at clapping the fans as well. 

---

Left backs: 

When we had no right backs we had loads of left backs. Reece James (not that one) looked frankly a bit cack playing in midfield but when he went to right back against Millwall he looked pretty good. He looks quite good at left back too. I don't know if it's just me, but he seems to move about out of possession like he's been carrying two massive bags of coal on his shoulders for ages and is tired out, but when the ball comes near him, he explodes into life. 

Despite what the chant suggests, Carlo never actually said Luke Garbutt was shite - he had literally no idea who he was and thus, he called him nothing at all. Also, I'm not sure Garbs is fucking dynamite either, - he's a player I like, but he's kind of the opposite of Callum Connelly at full back, all forward endeavour and a bit questionable at the defending stuff sometimes. Shouldn't have had a haircut is my deeply thought through footballing analysis. 

Jimmy Husband hasn't had a trim for ages and he suits the look of someone who is really into cryptocurrency and coffee.  He also increasingly suits playing centre back even though some of us (me included) still get a bit jittery at the thought of it. Jimmy is probably the player without a chant who deserves a chant most. He's capable of out jumping people far bigger than him, timing a challenge to perfection and pointing/shouting at corners. What's not to love? 


---

Centre backs: 

Why did we buy Ollie Casey? Who knows? He's played twice in the league cup, once at right back and didn't look dreadful but other than that, what is to say other than it seems there's a lot more footballers called 'Oliver' than there once were? 

I have a theory that Daniel Grettarson has been mistaken by Critch for Jordan Thorniley. Critch has forgotten he sent the latter to Oxford so keeps saying to the Viking things like "On the bench today Jordan and we'll look at moving you on in January when the lad from Iceland gets up to speed" to which the Viking looks puzzled and Mike Garrity mouths "just go with it Dan - I'll try and speak to him again" Another equally likely theory is that whilst the Iceman is clearly an able footballer and his positioning and distribution are excellent, the fact he seems to get poleaxed about 4 times every 45 minutes has led Critch to not be able to start him, such is the pain of watching him play. 

Why did we buy Richard Keogh we all thought. What a shoddy, Oyston-era type signing that felt like. How wrong we were. Even though he makes Brian Reid and Kirk Broadfoot look nimble and his first few games were a bit of a disaster, he's proven to be a shrewd signing, bringing know how, aerial prowess, beautiful use of the ball, terrific eyebrows, tremendous pointing at things no one else can see and so much more. I have never, ever seen a player of his age be so rawly enthusiastic about playing football in front of people. His celebrations are to die for. What will happen when he finally scores for us? Who knows? Everyone on the pitch? Football ends because it can't get any better? We love him. 

Hands up who remembers that Marvin Ekpiteta didn't start the season in the team. I know! Mentalism. It's like getting your head round the fact that the universe will start and end. It just doesn't compute. I'm tempted to write here that he's utter shite just to put off bigger clubs but then the idea that bigger clubs are thinking 'I know, we'll browse some shite football blogs as a guide to where to spend our billions' seems a bit far fetched. Giving the captain's armband was a stroke of genius - it's brought him out of his shell. He's not perfect, he still sometimes relies on his ability to recover more than he might, he still occasionally has a mad wander but honestly, one of those inch perfect sliding tackles or incredible blocks that are like having an extra goalie and you'd forgive him anything. 

---

Central Midfield: 

It's scary how few of these we have. We've tried playing full backs there but it's not a great plan. We've tried playing Kevin Stewart there but he breaks. It's a real shame that, because Kev is superb. I never really 'got' him watching on the laptop in the lockdown but in the flesh he's terrific. He blends physicality and intelligence and is probably good enough to free up one part of the double pivot to be more aggressive. It's just a shame he's made of balsa wood. 

Grant Ward had his injury woes before he signed for us and spent the early part of his Pool career with me going 'what does Grand Ward actually do?' as he seemed an odd fit for a midfield that seemed to need steel as opposed to a nice touch and a neat pass every now and again. By the time he was carried off at Bournemouth though, Ward had become an absolute favourite, a metronome, a player of balance, poise and grace, his football as stylish as his neatly manicured beard. 

Without Ward, Stewart and the yet to feature Matty Virtue, we had to turn to Ryan Wintle who is basically the most midfieldy midfielder ever. I can't decide if he's the new David Fox or the new David Vaughan. He can do everything pretty well (although I think he's only taking free kicks cos no one else wants to) and should Cardiff recall him, I think we've got a big hole in midfield to fill. He's kind of deceptively good because every game he's quite average. Which is good. Sort of. I haven't explained that very well. He's a fucking midfielder. He does what he needs to. He's midfieldy. I suppose 'midfieldy' isn't the sort of content you get in The Athletic is it? Well - fuck them. They all come from public school and are called Rory and have connections and support a team in Spain and some hipster non-league club. You can pay to get behind their paywall if you love them so much. Go on then. What are you waiting for?  

Kenny Dougall has shown little sign of scoring another 2 (not 1) goals but continues to be the buzzing heart of the midfield. Flying round the world isn't ideal however and I'd have been happier if Dougs had taken up his dad's Scottish nationality because Critch has possibly got jet lag mixed up with a more serious condition as he never seems to play him for about a week and a half after he's been down under as if he thinks he might die from being tired. Like Garbs, I think losing the trademark hair has been a mistake. Return to the bleach blonde and he'll be bagging braces in no time. More flying around in our midfield please Kenny and stay off the jumbo jets. Ta. 

Who knew I'd feature Natasha Bedingfield? Not me. 

Sonny Carey: 

When you sign a player from non league football, you expect them to be a bit ragged. You assume they'll have some sort of obvious attribute, like height or pace but will require a lot of coaching to learn how to use it well. Usually they don't. Carey doesn't fit this mould at all. He's nimble, balanced and intelligent. He's technically able and ambitious in the way he plays and his genius is the subtle art of finding space. He's struggled with certain situations (usually when starting in a game we're playing poorly) but he's superb at exploiting the gaps that open up in late game situations. He could have had a few more goals than he has with a bit more luck and his effort against Sheffield United is a not quite a goal of the season contender. We can get carried away with him or we can see what he does as a bonus at this point. I'm probably in the latter camp but he's going to be superb given time. 

---

Right Wing: 

We've got about 800 wingers and wing backs. Even Grant Ward used to be a winger.

Josh Bowler
is the man who has played on the right most of the time and probably the man who has had most impact. Whenever we don't play him, we look a bit short of impact. He's an firework of a player, but sometimes (often) one that emits the loud screech then doesn't go 'bang!' at the end. He annoys people cos he isn't very good at the stuff they could do (sweating, tackling, running after the other teams players and jumping) and is very good at the stuff they couldn't (hurdling over challenges at the speed of light, stopping dead, turning on sixpence, taking the ball out the sky and killing it dead.) I think it's accurate to say, he's a work in progress.    

Demi Mitchell is the proletariat workhorse to Josh Bowler's bourgeois decadent prancing pony. He'll give everything for the cause and do all the jobs that Josh won't (and he'll do them well). Unfortunately, he can't physically cross the ball with his right foot which means that playing him on the right and relying on him to provide crosses is a bit problematic. 

Anyone remember CJ Hamilton? He's that lad who is very quick and I once said was better than Ronaldo. It turns out I wasn't 100% accurate there. At the start of the season, he wasn't very which unfortunately rendered him pretty impotent. He's had a rough time recently has CJ and missed chances against West Brom (when he was very quick again but finished like he was scared of the ball) and Millwall seem to sum up the way the season has gone for him. I'm not sure he's got much left in tangerine. I hope I'm wrong. 

---

Left wing: 

Keshi Anderson is without doubt our most influential creative player and has made it look like rather than going up a league and the football getting harder, he's actually gone down and faced easier opponents. His impudence is off the scale. Some of his goals might look like luck but when you add up the number of simply ridiculous pieces of play he's pulled off, the conclusion had to be that he's a football genius. Most improved player in the squad by far. Finesse. The little golf putt finish against the team from the fake city whose university is too ashamed to use their name was Kesh in a bottle. Love him. 

Tyreese John-Jules This years Ben Woodburn? In a bit I'm going to go on a rant about Gary Madine versus players from premiership academies and it's tempting to make John-Jules exhibit number one in that argument. I quite liked him though. He was clearly a bit lost playing on the left and didn't really do it for us outside of a league cup game when he delivered possibly the two best deliveries all season and a couple of sexy passes at Bournemouth. We'll mostly remember him for doing the same stuff people moaned at Kaikai for not doing very well and looking a bit scared of scoring. Like he who continues to be misunderstood at Wycombe, I can't help feeling he never really played in the right set up and I always instinctively defend the player doing the wrong job. Some people seem to go through life, sure of themselves and their purpose - others feel a bit lost and question themselves in a life full of second guesses and self interrogation. I'm not sure how we've ended up in this existential corner but you get the idea I think. Move on.  

Imagine if we have an injury crisis and TJJ has to play and belts one in from 20 yards and then runs the game. How good would that actually be? 

Owen Dale 
has played on the right and the left. He was incredible for 20 minutes against Reading and since then has done very little. I like his penchant for switching the ball, his delivery and the slightly arrogant cut of his jib but it feels like he might lack a yard of pace that would allow him to make the most of what his head suggests his body does. I'm undecided on him. I wonder if Critch is also. 

---

Strikers: 

Shayne Lavery was, according to conventional wisdom, here to give back up to Yates who displayed the constitution of an ox to keep on playing at full pelt last year when we had no one at all to replace him. It turned out Shayne wasn't here to play second fiddle though and his Jerry Yates on steroids impression has won the hearts of both fans and Neil Critchley. He reminds me oddly of a kind of a slightly failed experimental process to create the opposite of Armand Gnanduillet. Ok, yeah, that's a stretch but go with me... He chases everything, he never leaves you thinking 'what if he put his body in there?' which isn't like Armand - like Armand though, he's got the knack of missing then scoring, of making a chance, then making another. Like Armand he's slightly unconventional and I wonder if so leftfield are some of his runs (he makes runs no one else would think of let alone do), it's (like Armand in a different way) going to be difficult for anyone to strike up a proper partnership with him. In other words, his genius is what makes him but also what makes him difficult to pair with. Keshi loves playing with him but I'm not sure he doesn't run off the other strikers radar so to speak. 

We've been going on the piss with Jerry Yates since May and we're still not bored of it. He's not yet hit the heights of last year where he was utterly brilliant after Christmas but he's still there and considering he's had a poor season in the eyes of some, he's actually got a very decent goal return and is our top scorer. I love Jerry to bits but he's really struggled playing on his own up front this year. That's hardly a surprise as he did last year too. I think he's going to get some crackers for us in the second half of the season. Far too good not to. I hope we play to his strengths a bit more instead of making him run around on his own because we're scared of the other team.  

Gary Madine - he's a goal machine. That's all there is to say. Ok, go then, I'll bite - he's also crucial to us because he allows us to attack in different ways, adds height in defence, gives off a 'been there, done that, don't give a fuck' vibe that we need and is a far better player than he gets credit for. It's easy to point out his deficiencies (he doesn't score very often and he's not very quick) but then, it's easy to manage a team in your head according to some kind of Pep-esque wet dream fantasy where you imagine us cutting the opposition to ribbons on the basis of triangles and movement every week. The Gary-doubters seem to see him as an offence to a football philosophy built on characterless kids hothoused in giant football battery farms who've never seen the outside world, so schooled are they on a dream of 'Barcelona' as a pointless romantic end point of football because they read it in a magazine or some pundit dickhead waxed lyrical about them. Fuck Barcelona. Overrated, one dimensional and boring. I love Gaz because he's lived a life and learned from it, because he gives us something no one else does and because he's the part of the machine that shows Critchley isn't playing Football Manager 2022 in his head - having Gaz around shows he understands that without some heft, we get pinned back, without some knowhow, we can look clueless. Having Gaz around means there's a lad in the changing rooms who can say 'oi, don't be a dickhead,' with meaning in his eyes

All hail the goal machine. Sign him up. 4 more years. 

The sort of attire you regularly see Gary doubters wearing. (fact)

Summary: 

We've been pretty steady all year. It took a few games to work out some kinks in the team but once we'd got a centre back pairing and right back, we've been generally pretty hard to beat and kept ourselves in most games. We certainly lack a little depth in midfield and even when everyone is fit, it's difficult to see where the creativity is beyond Carey who isn't yet ready to be a week in week out nailed on starter. Keshi has been tremendous but play him centrally and we lack cutting edge wide. Up front we're also a player short. The plan was possibly to play with one, hence only having three strikers but playing with two is proving an essential option and when of them is Gary Goals, inevitably one of them will miss some games. 

It's always easy to look at what you need though. Football fans are like greedy kids at Christmas, having opened a mountain of gifts and then saying 'is that it?' - there's no utter shite in the squad and whilst it definitely has room for improvement, you have to pinch yourself at where we are - almost exactly the same place we were this time last year, but a division higher. We've had some immense days out (Middlesbrough, Bournemouth and Sheffield United spring to mind) and some brilliant home games (Fulham, Blackburn and Preston seem the most obvious ones. For every duff performance (like Luton, Derby or Huddersfield) there's also a sense that we can put it behind us and put in a good one. 

That shouldn't be taken lightly and whilst it's difficult to see the squad as it is getting to much beyond lower mid table without a bit more in key areas, in itself that's an achievement and whoever we bring in needs to add skill and guile but also possess the same determination and spirit that has been evident throughout. 

We evidently need more goals but we have a good base to build upon. We've got more than enough points to survive even if we drop off a bit and if previous years are anything to judge, our recruitment midseason is targeted and effective and should help us prevent that possible dip. 

Interesting Numbers: 

Most goal involvements (goals plus assists) - Keshi Anderson and Jerry Yates (7) 

Most accurate passer - Richard Keogh (86.5% accuracy) 

Gets most tackles in - Kevin Stewart and Kenny Dougall - (2.3 per game)

Most shots - Shayne Lavery - (34) 

Most key passes - Keshi Anderson 39 (way ahead of anyone else, Josh Bowler is next with 19) 

Aerials won per game - Gary Madine (5pg) 

Crosses per game - Luke Garbutt 1.4 (way ahead of anyone else - Ryan Wintle is next with 0.8) 

Assists from all the central midfielders combined - (1 - Kev Stewart) 

GPGWGMS - We have scored 10 goals in Gary Madine's 9 starts. Thus when Gary plays from the beginning we average 1.11111111111111111111111111 (etc) goals per game. 

GPGMWGDS When Gary doesn't start (14 games) we have scored 13 goals at a rate of 0.92 per game. 

The conclusion we can obviously draw here is that Gary is a goal machine or to put it mathematically -
If Gary is x then y = Goals. 


Having cleared up any lingering doubts about wor Gaz, we'll turn to one of the biggest mysteries of the season which is why on earth Jordan Gabriel got dropped.

The graph below shows that our love of Gabriel isn't based merely on a whim or a fancy. 

There aren't that many other debates to really be had. If we assume 442 (and this is already far too long without getting in to that debate) - the midfield more or less picks itself - despite his faults Bowler has had a more telling impact at least in terms of putting the other team on the back foot than anyone else and the other three are shoe-ins. The defence is again fairly simple, maybe when Keogh is fit there'll be a question of Husband or James at left back. Maxwell getting injured again has solved the goalie conundrum. 

The fact there's not a lot of debate is a good thing - it shows that the majority of our key players have been there or thereabouts. It also perhaps shows that we need a few players to add a bit of pressure and that some of the fringe players are not really likely to do that. If we can add that central creativity and someone to add depth to the striking options who is more like Madine than they are like Jerry and Shayne then who knows? If Bowler could play like he did on Saturday more often then he'd be closer to matching Keshi for genuine impact. Maybe he can, maybe we need another wide player. I don't know. The point is, we're not so far off being pretty decent. 

Everyone thinks that though. It's this league. You can win and lose. No one is that good. No one is that shite either. Most of the games we've won we've could have lost and vice versa. 

It's all to come. Covid allowing. That can fuck off. Get big Gaz to stare at it till it decides better of it and decides not to be such a dickhead about stuff. 

Onward! 



 You can follow MCLF on Twitter and Facebook or subscribe directly by email on the homepage

If you appreciate the blog and judge it worth 1p or more, then a donation to one of the causes below which help kids and families in Blackpool would be grand.

Thursday, December 2, 2021

GROUP CHAT: The greatest piece of football media ever.


What is time? Maybe that is too complex (or perhaps too simple) a question. Time itself is kind of unknowable. Brian Cox says it's a force but he says mental shit I don't get at all so I'm not sure I trust him. And he's a bit creepy in the way he doesn't age, seems to be varnished and always thinks everything is amazing... With time, all we can really do is understand the way we measure it. Days, hours, minutes. Tides, sunrises, seasons. Life according to the clock is rhythm. 

A rhythm is but an invitation to dance, and (unless you're line dancing or something) we all express ourselves differently. This is a very long winded way of saying, perhaps time itself is not as interesting as the way we experience it. 

Half an hour is not long. You can imagine half an hour passing and nothing really being said at all and yet it's also long enough to cover a myriad of topics. The strange thing about time is, the more you fill a space with substance, the faster it seems to pass. 


Describing the content of 'Group Chat' is kind of impossible. It's like trying to explain the pictures made by a kaleidoscope as it turns. One minute we're on red triangles and yellow dots with green lines, the next it's blue squares that getting bigger against a backdrop of tiny green diamonds but now it's all turning yellow... 


(I should have added the 1953 FA Cup final)

We're discussing the very fabric of reality. We're discussing whether Chris Maxwell's t-shirts are too small. We're questioning if Richard Keogh can actually handle any negativity at all. We're admitting we're all a bit frightened of Gary. Gary is being disarmingly self effacing. He just traps it and gives it to the better players. Richard is looking to the camera with those big wide eyes that give him the look of a puppy who has had a tough life. Jimmy is anchoring it all with an impish nature that bursts through his down to earth solidity. His eyes light up whenever Gaz says something a bit idiosyncratic. You can tell he really likes that Gaz does that. You can tell they really do like each other. 


What is this thing? Why? I don't really know. It's the easy chemistry of a bunch of lads who get on. It's people who don't pretend to have all the answers asking questions about stuff that people who pretend to know all the answers don't really know either. It's a big whiter than white tracksuit. It's comfy. It could be awful. It could set your teeth on edge and make you want to smash your laptop and curse whoever thought 'club TV' was a good idea but instead it offers a rabbit hole shaped window into a closed world of wonders.  

Footballers are stereotyped because it's easy. They take each game as it comes. There's no easy games in this league but we're going to dust ourselves down Clive and go again. Footballers don't do this sort of thing. They don't just act like people. They don't chat shit and if they do, they don't let themselves be seen. They're guarded and cautious. They're weird. They're not normal. Not just lads like any others. Not like you or me with our mates. They're stilted and coached in front of the camera. Either a bit too earnest and serious or dull and boring like a kid who doesn't want to speak out loud in class reading an answer to a teacher. 

Jimmy, Richard and Gaz could talk for hours. About anything. I could listen to them forever. Nothing happens. Time passes. They wonder at things. They shoot the breeze. They gently poke fun and gently knock each other down and pick each other up. 

They must never leave this club. I'll pay double my season ticket price to give them contracts long after they've ceased to have any use as footballers as long as they keep talking about nothing and everything and anything. 


Sometimes you dream stuff and it feels like it's really happened. Sometimes real life can feel like you've dreamt it. Did it really happen? Did Jimmy really lean forward and, through fits of laughter insist "I didn't see a pistachio nut in the gaff?" Did Gary listen with a look of incomprehension to the discussion on Jay-Z purchasing a ludicrously expensive avatar and then ask the most pertinent question you could ask about a million quids worth of pixels "Why? what can [it] do?" before launching into a coherent explanation of the difference between humans and 'animals and that' and what divides us and why that might be... 


I might create a looping sample of Jimmy Husband saying 'You're not in control of your own actions' and set it to a driving beat. A piece of filthy Detroit Techno or something. 

"You're not in control of your own actions....? (duh, duh, duh duh, duh, duh, duh, duh, duh) "You're not in control of your own actions....?" 

The crowd sweating. Teeth grinding. Beats and bass vibrating your bones. We're all just fucking people after all. Just people. That's all we are. Pretending to be all sorts of things and finding all sorts of ways to fall out and divide ourselves, but really, we're just people. Chatting shite. Full of ignorance and wonder. Lost and confused on a massive rock going 'what is all this anyway?' All we can do is chat shite to those stuck on the rock with us who like us, know next to fuck all other than the stories we tell ourselves and each other... Dance to that beat....You're not in control...... 

Group chat asks questions. It answers questions. It's completely mental and absolutely fucking brilliant. I love Crazy Uncle Richard, wor Gaz and the Topknot God even more than I already did for doing this and whoever thought of putting them in front of the camera and just leaving them to it is a genius. 

Many questions remain that the group's wisdom and wonder could be applied to, but there's a key one that needs to be asked more than any other...

When is the next episode? 

Am I in control of my own actions? Sometimes, I think not... Dance fuckers. Dance. 

ONWARD! 




You can follow MCLF on Twitter and Facebook or subscribe directly by email on the homepage

If you appreciate the blog and judge it worth 1p or more, then a donation to one of the causes below which help kids and families in Blackpool would be grand.


Follow on Twitter!

Get MCLF in your inbox!

Subscribe with a feedreader!

Buy the book (proceeds to Blackpool Foodback)

Labels

Blog Archive

Yet another bad owner. Where do they breed them?

This is Brooks Mileson. He owned Gretna FC. If you don't know who he is or what the score is with Gretna, it might be worth giving it ...